It's not just the Board; it was clear to me from Larry's remarks that the NTIA will not buy into a member model either. And if they aren't buying into it, it will not happen. Cheers. Stephen Deerhake -----Original Message----- From: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Malcolm Hutty Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2015 12:16 PM To: Nigel Roberts <nigel@channelisles.net>; accountability-cross-community@icann.org Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Communications Ideas On 27/09/2015 15:48, Nigel Roberts wrote:
Unless the community give up the idea of ICANN having members (whether one or seven billion) the Board will not agree a common proposal.
I wish I had been able to attend the face-to-face meeting. Were the Board able to be any more clear as to why they insist on the community giving up on the idea of having at least a single member? -- Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523 Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/ London Internet Exchange Ltd 21-27 St Thomas Street, London SE1 9RY Company Registered in England No. 3137929 Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community