Hi Mathieu, Many thanks for your email and the one pagers. I have glanced through the documents and noticed the need for a governance framework (in broad terms) that satisfies the needs of the evolving ICANN community. It would be interesting to look at some ideas that are acceptable under the Californian Law from those familiar with the jurisdiction. Regards On 6/22/15, Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill@afnic.fr> wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
As discussed last friday when we reviewed the public comments, some of the feedback we have received require us to consider whether and how we should address several topics : - staff accountability culture - Board duties and roles - enhancing diversity - enhancing SO/AC accountability
In order to kick start discussions on these topics, we have assembled one pagers attempting to describe each issue (based essentially on comments we have received) as well some of the potential actions that were suggested. Please note that these are discussion papers and in no way reflect any "position" on the matters.
It is anticipated that we could have initial discussions on these topics In our upcoming work sessions. But this mailing list is also an appropriate place to share your reflections on these matters, as I noted Jordan already did on another thread.
Best regards,
-- Mathieu WEILL
-- Barrack O. Otieno +254721325277 +254-20-2498789 Skype: barrack.otieno http://www.otienobarrack.me.ke/