Sept. 28, 2015
7 p.m.
On 28 Sep 2015, at 19:44, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman@lrrlaw.com> wrote:
that IS the Multistakeholder process and either we follow and believe in that process or we don’t. This is why time was spent in Los Angeles carefully reviewing ALL public comments. The process followed by the CCWG – ACCT must be systematic and must be reflective of the process followed in previous Working Groups. If not, we have zero integrity and zero claim that “The Multi-Stakeholder process is working and is a beautiful thing.”
I agree. This seems an opportune moment to point out that most of the Public Comments submitted in the first round remain relevant. We shouldn't overlook them. Malcolm.