I am not sure that it is needed, but if we do talk about the importance of one kind of law or another we should be clear that we are talking about the law that would ordinarily apply in the situation at hand, i.e., "applicable law" J. Beckwith Burr Neustar, Inc. / Deputy General Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer 1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20006 Office: + 1.202.533.2932 Mobile: +1.202.352.6367 / becky.burr@neustar.biz / www.neustar.biz Reduce your environmental footprint. Print only if necessary. Follow Neustar: Facebook LinkedIn Twitter The information contained in this email message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this email message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message. -----Original Message----- From: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Dr Eberhard W Lisse Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 9:16 AM To: accountability-cross-community@icann.org Subject: Re: [CCWG-Accountability] Related work on ICANN's Public Interest Why do we need to put something vague in, which is furthermore self evident? el On 2014-12-17 15:13 , Burr, Becky wrote:
Suggest "applicable national and international law"
Sent from my iPad
On Dec 16, 2014, at 11:49 AM, Carl Schonander <cschonander@SIIA.net <mailto:cschonander@SIIA.net>> wrote:
Steve et all:
Would like to propose the inclusion of the following sentence in between the last two sentences of the proposed definition. "Respect for international and national law is essential."
Carl