Glad you agree that is needed. WS1 work can be streamlined if we all know that it includes a process that guarantees fair and expeditious consideration and implementation of ideas developed in WS2. Best regards Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal Virtualaw LLC 1155 F Street, NW Suite 1050 Washington, DC 20004 202-559-8597/Direct 202-559-8750/Fax 202-255-6172/cell Twitter: @VlawDC "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey From: Drazek, Keith [mailto:kdrazek@verisign.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 9:32 AM To: Phil Corwin Cc: accountability-cross-community@icann.org Subject: Re: Requirements for WS1 Hi Phil, good to hear from you. The answer is yes...I agree that would be needed. Keith On Jan 20, 2015, at 3:25 PM, "Phil Corwin" <psc@vlaw-dc.com<mailto:psc@vlaw-dc.com>> wrote: Keith: In addition to the new group powers including "approval of any future changes to ICANN bylaws, Articles of Incorporation, etc.", would it also have any ability to propose changes to Bylaws, Articles of Incorporation, etc., along with a process for consideration and approval of them? I think that is necessary to ensure that WS2 proposals get due consideration. Thanks and best regards, Philip Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal Virtualaw LLC 1155 F Street, NW Suite 1050 Washington, DC 20004 202-559-8597/Direct 202-559-8750/Fax 202-255-6172/cell Twitter: @VlawDC "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey From: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Drazek, Keith Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 3:16 AM To: accountability-cross-community@icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org> Subject: [CCWG-Accountability] Requirements for WS1 All, here are a few key points for inclusion in the list of the necessary Work Stream 1 reforms. I believe if we secure these into WS1, the WS2 issues can be addressed later with confidence. 1. Bylaw amendments incorporating AoC accountability and transparency obligations. 2. A new membership structure grounded in the community to ensure the Board is accountable to something or someone other than itself. The group would have substantial but narrow powers, including (a) annual budget approval/disapproval (b) spilling the board (c) review of board decisions (d) referral of Board decisions to an independent redress mechanism, (e) approval of any future changes to ICANN bylaws, Articles of Incorporation, etc. 3. A reformed Independent Review Process (IRP) including addition of a new light-weight process. Key components: Independent (from the Board) internal review, independent redress and binding decisions. Possible external judiciary for dispute resolution after all internal community processes have failed. Keith "This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may be constituted as attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, notify sender immediately and delete this message immediately." ________________________________ No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com> Version: 2015.0.5645 / Virus Database: 4260/8932 - Release Date: 01/14/15 ________________________________ No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com> Version: 2015.0.5645 / Virus Database: 4260/8932 - Release Date: 01/14/15