Kavouss, The reason is that the concerns are broader than Recommendation 11. There is also the interplay of Recommendation 11 with Recommendations 1 and 10. Becky is trying to address those broader concerns in her proposal. Best, Brett ________________________________ Brett Schaefer Jay Kingham Senior Research Fellow in International Regulatory Affairs Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom Davis Institute for National Security and Foreign Policy The Heritage Foundation 214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE Washington, DC 20002 202-608-6097 heritage.org<http://heritage.org/> From: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Kavouss Arasteh Sent: Monday, February 01, 2016 11:36 AM To: Matthew Shears Cc: accountability-cross-community@icann.org Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] The 60 percent solution Dear Brett Dear Mathieu No There are many support for this fairly simple approach Becky, suggestion , while highly appreciated, is complex and could involve extensive study from legal, operational and procedural view point . It may also be considered outside our mandate since it nay be considered indirectly or ,,?as some sort of restructuring.( see views expressed in its regard) Why not take this quite simple and straightforward approach Regards Kavousd