That's why I've suggested the bylaws text be fixed.... On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 01:22:46PM -0400, Greg Shatan wrote:
I've replied to this point on the original thread. In short, my proposal does not change the report. If anything, the current proposed bylaws text changes the report by implying that a higher level of approval for the FOI was intended, when that was not the intent of the group or the proposal.
In which case, the bylaw text needs to be fixed, which was my main point. I think that's the key: that there be exact alignment between the report and what the bylaws say, even if we conclude now that the resulting bylaw has side effects we don't like.
A
-- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com