Eberhard, Check the poll results, it¹s not the board. CCWG members are objecting to the inclusion of section (2). I am offering theory nor explanation, but strangely enough, most of those not objecting to its inclusion are (NCSG) participants, not members of the CCWG Best, Roelof On 23-02-16 13:25, "accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org on behalf of Dr Eberhard W Lisse" <accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org on behalf of el@lisse.na> wrote:
So have your colleagues on the Board pull their objection.
el
On 2016-02-23 14:16, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" wrote:
My only recommendation to all parties is please, be flexible enough to find a fair compromise to enable moving forward. You have agreed 99 %. It would be a shame if in the last minute a remaining controversial issue blocks the historical agreement.
Wolfgang
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community