Jan. 9, 2016
1:31 p.m.
On 8 Jan 2016, at 17:49, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org> wrote:
Perhaps we should test against a set of things that the Board decided were in scope in the past years and see whether they would still be in scope with the rewrite.
Do you believe that the definition of whether something is in scope is whether the Board previously considered it in scope?