Bruce With respect, again, there is no applicable law requiring ICANN to respect human rights since the only applicable laws (whether domestic law or international law) apply ONLY to governments and public authorities, so this By-Law is an effective nullity. It sounds nice, and means nothing in terms of committing ICANN to do anything but follow California law, which is is obliged to do anyway. Why is the ICANN Board scared of agreeing to respect the rights in the UDHR?? It should be proud to set an example to other multistakeholder and private sector organisations. On 04/02/16 07:33, Bruce Tonkin wrote:
t to respect internationally recognized Human Rights as required by applicable law. This provision does not create any additiona