On 09-Nov-15 11:28, Pedro Ivo Ferraz da Silva wrote: */_if not followed, requires finding mutually agreed solutions for implementation of that advice_/* The current bylaws state:
The Governmental Advisory Committee and the ICANN Board will then try, in good faith and in a timely and efficient manner, to find a mutually acceptable solution.
I am wondering whether the the words 'try , in good faith and in a timely and efficient manner, ' were accidentally dropped from the newly proposed formulation. Form my perspective there is a world of difference between requiring a genuine attempt to find a mutually acceptable solution and the requirement for finding one. In one case if the attempt fails, the Board is still free to make a to reject the advice. In the later, the Board seems bound to find a mutually agreed upon solution without the abilty to reject the advice if no such solution can be found. Can someone clarify this for me? I accept that having missed a few meeting lately, my understanding may be lagging, but that is my reason for returning to the proposed and existing language. thanks avri --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus