I am sorry Mathieu, but the compromise is not a well thought out one. The change from full UN-based consensus to absence of significant objection is either meaningless (if it equates to the absence of formal objection/UN standard) or an unacceptable expansion of GAC authority (f it means something less than full UN consensus). If it is the latter, it will be rightly opposed by most members of the community, including me and it will, I am quite certain, result in the rejection of our report by the chartering organizations, by NTIA and by the US Congress. I appreciate that in order to placate a recalcitrant minority of the GAC you are trying to find a compromise, but this language crosses a red line for me and I think for many others. Paul Paul Rosenzweig <mailto:paul.rosenzweigesq@redbranchconsulting.com> paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com O: +1 (202) 547-0660 M: +1 (202) 329-9650 VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739 Skype: paul.rosenzweig1066 <http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=articl e&id=19&Itemid=9> Link to my PGP Key From: Mathieu Weill [mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr] Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 12:42 PM To: Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community@icann.org> Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] TR: ST18 subgroup report Nov 23 Dear Colleagues, Please find attached a report from the ST18 subgroup, for discussion during the CCWG call in about 12 hours. This is a co-chair summary, with options about which we will discuss in order to define our groups way forward for the Draft Report. I want to express my warmest appreciation and thanks to all the ST18 subgroup colleagues who participated with great interest to our work, and especially to the colleagues who provided constructive inputs to these discussions. Best Mathieu De : Mathieu Weill [mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr] Envoyé : lundi 23 novembre 2015 18:39 À : s18@icann.org <mailto:s18@icann.org> Objet : ST18 subgroup report Nov 23 Dear Colleagues, Please find attached the (very summarized) report of our work that will be presented tomorrow in the CCWG. It will be circulated momentarily to the full group. Thanks again for all the constructive and valuable inputs you have provided to advance this key item of our work. Best, Mathieu