On 15/01/2016 15:27, Greg Shatan wrote:
I also have to say that I find Fiona's words convincing. When a document (or any portion thereof) is ambiguous on its face, the intentions of the drafters are a key factor in clarifying the ambiguity. I consider the meaning and purpose of Section 3 to be clarified, and I withdraw my concerns about how Section 3 is being handled by the CCWG.
To the extent anyone thinks this issue is (or rather, was) significant enough to derail the entire "AoC" Recommendation and postpone it to WS2, I submit that this is now a non-issue.
Yes, Fiona makes entirely clear that add "consumer trust" to the general Mission, without specifically limiting it the new gTLD, cannot be justified as an implementation of the AoC. Since we were only considering AoC implementation and not general extensions of the Mission, this proposal is now dead, not only for now but also for WS2, I quite agree. Malcolm. -- Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523 Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/ London Internet Exchange Ltd Monument Place, 24 Monument Street, London EC3R 8AJ Company Registered in England No. 3137929 Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA