At this stage of implementation, it can not change anything that has been decided previously... Kind regards Alberto -----Mensaje original----- De: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] En nombre de avri doria Enviado el: sábado, 30 de abril de 2016 12:51 a.m. Para: accountability-cross-community@icann.org Asunto: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] The whois/RDS-RT bylaw vs. current activities On 29-Apr-16 15:53, Christopher Wilkinson wrote:
Whois reviews start from the premise that current policy is correct and should not be changed and all we need to do is review its effectiveness?
Well, actually, the current Whois policy is not correct, and should be changed.
I see no reason a Review could not point out errors and recommend that a policy process do something about them. avri --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community This email has been protected by YAC (Yet Another Cleaner) http://www.yac.mx