On 17/11/2015 18:39, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
Shouldn't be regulable by ICANN.
In the ideal world, I agree. So if we're willing to say, "other than information services provided by parties to the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA) or the Registry Agreement (RA) *as provided for in those agreements*" then I think we're all in agreement. If that is not acceptable, I have a set of reasons why objectively registries should bear any residual risk, rather than non-contracted parties, but I hope the above is acceptable to Becky, so we won't need to consider my argument in the alternative. Malcolm.
-----Original Message----- What if I (as a registry or registrar) provide an information service (i.e., any software process that accepts connections from the Internet) as a completely separate from the service I provide under contract to ICANN?
J. Beckwith Burr Neustar, Inc. / Deputy General Counsel & Chief Privacy Officer 1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington D.C. 20006 Office: +1.202.533.2932 Mobile: +1.202.352.6367 / neustar.biz <http://www.neustar.biz>
On 11/17/15, 5:57 AM, "Malcolm Hutty" <malcolm@linx.net> wrote:
"other than information services provided by parties to the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA) or the Registry Agreement (RA)"
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-- Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523 Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/ London Internet Exchange Ltd Monument Place, 24 Monument Street, London EC3R 8AJ Company Registered in England No. 3137929 Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA