If we come up with multiple different proposals and put these to the vote/poll, we will exclude the Participants because only the Members are polling/voting. "In appointing their members, the chartering organizations should note that the CCWG-Accountability's decision-making methodologies require that CCWG-Accountability members act by consensus, and that polling will only be used in rare instances and with the recognition that such polls do not constitute votes." "In a rare case, the chair(s) may decide that the use of a poll is reasonable to assess the level of support for a recommendation. However, care should be taken in using polls that they do not become votes, as there are often disagreements about the meanings of the poll questions or of the poll results." I do not have a concern about polling about the current 2/3 proposal. I personally am comfortable with the 60% solution, if it gets a Public Comment. el On 2016-02-01 09:17, Greg Shatan wrote:
We are only "polling," not "voting."
It seems, however, that the poll will have the same effect as a vote, to the extent the effect is discernible from the Chairs' email.
On Monday, February 1, 2016, Dr Eberhard W Lisse <epilisse@gmail.com> wrote:
That would be change our working method to voting, wouldn't it?
el [...]
-- Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar) el@lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell) PO Box 8421 \ / Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/