Dear All, The situation on how the formal comments from chartering organizations would be considred and taken into account is not clear. The deadline is 22 January. Consequently we MUST WAIT untgil the deadline is expired ,in taking into account the comments then conclude on each recommendations This is AN IMPORTANT ISSUE Regards KAVOUSS 2016-01-06 23:26 GMT+01:00 Robin Gross <robin@ipjustice.org>:
Several comments in the public comment period called for a specific WS2 transparency issue of “transparency over board deliberations”. NCSG was among those commenters. How do we include the views of those who’s comments weren’t taken into account in the document / discussion for 1st reading on Rec. 12 in yesterday’s call? The GNSO’s comments don’t come in until next week, so how will they be incorporated into Rec. 12 if we’ve already done the 2 readings before we’ve even seen the GNSO view on Rec. 12? It looks like only the board’s concerns were reflected in the document / discussion for the 1st reading of Rec #12. How do we include other stakeholder concerns in these discussions?
Thanks, Robin
On Jan 6, 2016, at 6:02 AM, Mathieu Weill <Mathieu.Weill@afnic.fr> wrote:
<Formatted-Annex 12-PROOFED-1stREAD.pdf>
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community