Yes On 2/2/16, 10:17 AM, "accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org on behalf of Malcolm Hutty" <accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org on behalf of malcolm@linx.net> wrote:
On 02/02/2016 14:26, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
The addition of the following text might help allieviate that concern:
"This clause does not create a presumption that the Board shall accept such advice, or change the criteria for how it shall be evaluated."
I'm a little uncomfortable with all the ways the document keeps growing descriptions of what it is not.
Fair enough. I'm sure it can be stated in a positive fashion; I didn't expect this to be final bylaws text anyway.
Can we agree the principle that we're only changing the voting threshold and not trying to create a new presumption of obedience, and leave it to the lawyers to come up with the best language to avoid any unintended consequences?
Malcolm.
-- Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523 Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/
London Internet Exchange Ltd Monument Place, 24 Monument Street, London EC3R 8AJ
Company Registered in England No. 3137929 Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community