Hi all, I agree with Seuns proposal, it is simpler. Best Regards On 2/23/17, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
I also had issues around this but I soon got used to it within the CCWG.
That said and while I understand we've made a call for a small group to figure this out. I will suggest that this doesn't result to yet another multiple pages document with new titles that requires getting used to. I think we can rely on the existing profile categorisation on the site which indicates the following 3 categories (as Tijani also hinted during the call):
- ICANN Community - ICANN Staff - ICANN Board
There is something about the MS community[2] as well and that includes the ICANN Board (which I think is appropriate because the community put the Board)
I think ICANN organisation should be the single word phrase that covers the entire 3 categories.
Regards 1. https://www.icann.org/community/explore 2. https://www.icann.org/community
Sent from my LG G4 Kindly excuse brevity and typos
On Feb 22, 2017 07:25, "avri doria" <avri@acm.org> wrote:
But which I have seen elsewhere.
Does/should WS2 have a consistent terminology for deal with the dichotomy between a single ICANN multistakeholder organization and the Trinity of Board, Staff & the community.
Each person writing a doc finds another clever way to try and express this, but they all differ a bit.
It struck us that it might be useful for there to be one set of language for expressing this across the work we are doing. Is there such a set of terminology that I have missed?
perhaps this can be added to AOB in the plenary meeting?
thanks
avri
--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-- Barrack O. Otieno +254721325277 +254733206359 Skype: barrack.otieno PGP ID: 0x2611D86A