Notwithstanding the transparency concerns this suggestion offers, it is more evidence that even the authors of the CCWG proposal don't understand it themselves. el On 2015-11-11 14:35, Megan.Richards@ec.europa.eu wrote:
Let's find a moment to clarify orally instead of flooding all others with these exchanges and I rather suspect trying their patience
Sent from my iPhone. Please excuse any typing errors
On 11 Nov 2015, at 07:27, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org> wrote:
Hi,
Ok, I remain confused.
Are you saying that if they call their advice 'consensus advice' it can apply if they claim that status, but otherwise it doesn't?
Please forgive me for my inability to truly understand what is being proposed. Perhaps I have been supporting the notion of equal footing in multistakeholder process for too long to understand some of the nuances.
avri [...]
-- Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar) el@lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell) PO Box 8421 \ / Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/