Possibly I am alone here, but I don’t share that opinion. Of course, if we receive only a handful of comments, that will work. But if we get a lot (which is what I hope), it probably won’t. And I don’t feel the need at all to be part of the analysis of all comments. I have more than enough trust and faith in my fellow members/participants to share the work between us Best, Roelof From: Thomas Rickert <rickert@anwaelte.de<mailto:rickert@anwaelte.de>> Date: donderdag 21 mei 2015 11:29 To: Roelof Meijer <roelof.meijer@sidn.nl<mailto:roelof.meijer@sidn.nl>> Cc: Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org<mailto:alice.jansen@icann.org>>, Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community@icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] June 9 Call - On behalf of CCWG Cochairs Avri suggested (rightfully) that the analysis of comments should not be done by subgroups, but by the whole group.