We need to add an evaluation of the "Cooperative Engagement Process" or "CEP" - the initial or pre step to trigger an IRP on an ICANN decision. There are timing, transparency, and due process issues to consider in the CEP step an ICANN IRP. Thanks, Robin On Mar 6, 2015, at 9:18 AM, Alice Munyua wrote:
Dear David
Thank you. Re-sending and would like to add another issue regarding timely communication to all affected parties.
Best regards Alice
Alice Thanks - it doesn't look like your message got distributed to the group list which I think would be a good idea - David
At 01:48 AM 3/6/2015, you wrote:
Dear David,
Thank you for this list of topics.
11. Should the IRP be provided with clear time lines for each stage 12 What provisions can be put in place for redress against the IRP provider in the event the process goes off track
Best regards Alice Munyua AUC
On 06/03/2015 01:19, David Post wrote:
[This is for the Independent Review subgroup: Paul Rosenzweig, David McAuley, Jonathan Zuck, Robin Gross, Chris LaHatte, me]. I don't think a separate mailing list has been set up, so I apologize to the rest of you who are working on other issues here]
I'm a little bit late to the WP2 party, but I thought, just for the purpose of kicking off our discussion, we might see if there we can generate a list of topics that we need to cover for the design of the IRP --
I'm sure there are others, but here's a starter group, picking up on some of the "issues" listed in the latest work item list and adding a few others:
1. Will the IRP be a permanent standing panel, or will it have rotating membership? 2. What is the scope of the IRB's jurisdiction - what kinds of claims can it hear? 3. What standard of review will it use to render its decisions? 4. Standing - who can bring claims to the IRP? 5. How will IRB members be nominated and appointed? 6. Term - for how long will IRP members serve? Can they be re-appointed? 7. Will there be a process for removal of IRP members? 8. Costs - who will pay IRP costs? 9. How will IRP decisions be implemented? Are they binding on the Board? Can they be overturned by the Board? 10. Should changes to the IRP process be made permanent (i.e., not subject to Board modification)? If so, how can we accomplish that?
As I said, I'm sure there are things missing or mis-stated - but I do think it would be worth trying to put a list like this together to structure our discussion as we plunge forward. David
******************************* David G Post - Senior Fellow, Open Technology Institute/New America Foundation blog (Volokh Conspiracy) http://www.washingtonpost.com/people/david-post book (Jefferson's Moose) http://tinyurl.com/c327w2n music http://tinyurl.com/davidpostmusic publications etc. http://www.davidpost.com *******************************
_______________________________________________ WP2 mailing list WP2@icann.org
_______________________________________________ WP2 mailing list WP2@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp2
******************************* David G Post - Senior Fellow, Open Technology Institute/New America Foundation blog (Volokh Conspiracy) http://www.washingtonpost.com/people/david-post book (Jefferson's Moose) http://tinyurl.com/c327w2n music http://tinyurl.com/davidpostmusic publications etc. http://www.davidpost.com *******************************
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community