Do you believe that applicable law would be understood as the Californian or US Federal Law? Tks Kavouss Sent from my iPhone
On 29 Jan 2016, at 13:10, Nigel Roberts <nigel@channelisles.net> wrote:
EXACTLY!
We are doing well here.
On 29/01/16 12:07, Bruce Tonkin wrote:
My problem with "applicable law" is that Human Rights are fundamental, whereas laws differ from country to country. And Human Rights can not be "diminished", for the lack of a better word, by the laws of a country.
So, if "applicable law" mean the Bylaws and not the law of any country or countries, lets's put this in, if only for avoidance of doubt.
I would also expect that ICANN is already subject to "applicable" national laws - whether or not they are in the bylaws.
So a bylaw that states that ICANN is subject to applicable laws seems somewhat redundant.
Regards, Bruce Tonkin
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community