On 10/17/15 9:51 AM, Steve DelBianco wrote:
In GAC session today, some said they did not understand why we needed Stress Test 18.
While January is quite a long time ago, even in ICANN process development time, at the time when the BC provided their scenarios to "Work Group #4" I wrote:
-- BC #6. GAC votes
The accountability issue here isn't obvious to me. The bylaws create several Advisory Councils, each of which may have distinct internal processes resulting in the issuance of advice. A change in any AC's internal process does not necessarily create an accountability issue.
I suggest this item should be discarded.
Here we are, still using our very finite time, on a scenario the better part of a year's aging has not improved. Eric Brunner-Williams Eugene, Oregon