Feb. 21, 2016
10:38 p.m.
Hi, On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 10:12:57PM +0100, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
*Consequently the so-called special privilege repeatedly referred to by others would in fact very rarely happens *
In that case, of course, the carve-out doesn't take effect anyway. So if this is in fact to be so rare, why would anyone argue that it needs to be changed? The argument, "Such-and-thus effect is never going to happen, so we must set up the procedures around it perfectly," doesn't really seem to hang together. Best regards, A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com