Interesting Greg. I haven’t gone back to check regarding whether all our comments were addressed, but I know we indicated those same two problems with Annex 9 in our comments prior to the issuance of the third draft proposal. It may make sense in preparation for the next draft to go back through now and highlight any other items that were not addressed. HOLLY J. GREGORY Partner and Co-Chair Global Corporate Governance & Executive Compensation Practice Sidley Austin LLP 787 Seventh Avenue New York, NY 10019 +1 212 839 5853 holly.gregory@sidley.com<mailto:holly.gregory@sidley.com> www.sidley.com<http://www.sidley.com/> [http://www.sidley.com/files/upload/signatures/SA-autosig.png]<http://www.sidley.com/> SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP From: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Greg Shatan Sent: Friday, December 04, 2015 11:02 AM To: accountability-cross-community@icann.org Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] Two Questions on Annex 9 I have two questions on Annex 9 (AoC Reviews): 1. Footnote 2 is empty. What is supposed to be there? (Para 21) 2. There is a table showing the composition of past AoC review teams. There is no introduction or explanatory text associated with this table. What is the significance of the table supposed to be? (Paras. 128-164) Thanks! Greg **************************************************************************************************** This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us immediately. ****************************************************************************************************