Bruce, The case addresses and touches some among many short coming in the ICANN accountability such as the status of the IRP ( binding, Non binding, Comparative study or what ? These are the imoportant issues to be really examined analized and acted uopon. Regards Kavouss 2015-03-08 7:55 GMT+01:00 Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au>:
Hello Alice,
We appreciate that IRP proceedings are published.
What we have found lacking is timely regular communication from ICANN staff and availability of a predictable schedule, which brings us back to the issue of clear timelines for each stage.
Yes - that is a good point. I will see what we can do in that area. The IRP is run independently of ICANN - but we can at least be asking the question, and posting the answers we receive.
As you have already pointed out we need to be able to hold the providers of such dispute services accountable as well.
Regards, Bruce Tonkin
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community