Agree strongly with Andrew here. It is another example of how advocates of including the Consumer Trust stuff seem to be deaf to the concern that is being expressed. You can't just leave that language in there without a very specific context. If the consumer trust advocates can't accept such a basic and simple limitation on the applicability of thee AoC language, I would say that the whole AoC incorporation into the bylaws needs to be kicked to WS2.
-----Original Message----- From: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Sullivan Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 4:50 PM To: accountability-cross-community@icann.org Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] "Christmas trees" and "Consumer Trust" in Article 1 of the Bylaws
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 04:40:01PM -0500, Greg Shatan wrote:
The "DNS marketplace" is the term that's used in the AoC, so I assume there is background and history to show how that is viewed in this context.
Several of us (including, I'm afraid, anybody I know who actually has to operate servers) _always_ thought it was a terribly unfortunate term, that it was careless language, and that it was going to come back and hurt. But people were willing to live with it because they thought it was limited to the new TLDs; and, since those new TLDs couldn't be used in any other part of the Internet before delegation, it was not so risky.
The very concern that many of us had is now being proposed to be activated now. This is the same kind of problem that the IAB was worried about earlier in the over-broad mission language.
Best regards,
A
-- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross- Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community