Dear Co-Chairs, can you please advise the two ALAC participants who the ALAC leadership is, so they can take it up with them? Preferably off line. el On 2015-09-15 09:45, Arun Sukumar wrote:
Hi Seun
I think the main puzzle is how exactly will ICANN/Co-Chairs apportion funding to participants. What determines those who "constructively" contributes? Is it by leading the working parties, by number of mails written? Or by number of meetings attended? Or as you put it those who make public comments?
Those are pertinent and legitimate questions. If I may turn them around, what criteria in addition to these will SO/AC leadership use to verify evaluate travel support applications?
If participants will be funded (which I am actually in support of), then perhaps doubling the travel slots for each SO/AC and letting them determine which of their participants attend is the better option at ensuring balance.
Also a constructive suggestion. I would only add that additional travel slots should not be created specifically to populate CCWG ranks so late in the day - this is an open group and applications should be evaluated on the basis of need and participation from existing participants.
Arun
[...] -- Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar) el@lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell) PO Box 8421 \ / Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/