Nigel, Why is being a "participant" relevant? As a member, I find it extremely hard to make some calls and in fact, missed one yesterday because it exactly overlapped with a meeting I was chairing. Sometimes attendance is easy, sometimes it required moving mountains, and sometimes I simply opt out for various reasons. Alan At 29/07/2015 04:27 AM, Nigel Roberts wrote:
As a mere participant I have found it almost impossible to join the calls due to the vast number of them and the release of important documents no more than hours before.
If I was cynical, I would suggest this method of working was deliberately exclusionary.
As several other participants know from their membership of another extremely important and potentially controversial WG, there is another, better, way.
But that would incompatible with the self-created urgency.
I am beginning to become seriously worried that major changes will be made to the ICANN structure and IANA relationship without the time for due consideration, just because there's a US Presidential election in the office.
On 07/29/2015 09:05 AM, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
I have a previous engagement at 17:00 UTC.
And as previously I object against having 2 or more calls on the same day.
greetings, el
On 2015-07-29 08:23, Grace Abuhamad wrote:
Dear all,
The poll is now closed. Staff will proceed to schedule _two calls for Thursday 30 July_:
* 11:00 13:00 UTC * 17:00 19:00 UTC (this call may need to be extended depending on progress made)
Please look forward to calendar notices. The Agenda will follow later today.
Best, Grace [...]
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community