Agree with Avri here: ICANN is responsible for several regulatory aspects of the DNS market, and should do so.
it is not a content regulator
That does not exclude normal regulatory aspects. CW On 16 Dec 2015, at 20:23, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org> wrote:
On 16-Dec-15 05:27, Bruce Tonkin wrote:
(2) ICANN is not a regulator, and does not regulate content through these contracts.
doesn't this just mean it is not a content regulator without indicating that it is not a regulator in any other aspect of the role?
avri
--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community