Agree with Andrew, the CWG was/is the place for such discussions not the CCWG. -Jg On 16/11/2015, 1:49 p.m., "accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org on behalf of Andrew Sullivan" <accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org on behalf of ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:08:22PM +0000, Nigel Roberts wrote:
In my view, the reason this has been resisted, is that the ICANN Establishment would see this as a threat to the larger 'empire' it has created.
I'm not really sure why this list is the correct place to discuss post-transition arrangements for IANA -- even for names -- given that ICANN has a whole working group talking about that very topic.
Best regards,
A
-- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community