Malcolm Pls read my three/ mails Either lowering threshold or considering Becky, s editorially amended alternative in a mutually exclusive manner . Or you propose to just considering 60% threshold and forget about Becky, proposal. I totally disagree to consider both as complementary proposal since the discussion on call 81 was just about two thresholds; Simple majority or 2/3 . Then the 60% was proposed as a compromise. Pls read my several messages in this regard Regard Kavousd Sent from my iPhone
On 2 Feb 2016, at 16:58, Burr, Becky <Becky.Burr@neustar.biz> wrote:
+1
J. Beckwith Burr Neustar, Inc. / Deputy General Counsel & Chief Privacy Officer 1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington D.C. 20006 Office: +1.202.533.2932 Mobile: +1.202.352.6367 / neustar.biz <http://www.neustar.biz>
On 2/2/16, 10:55 AM, "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 03:17:23PM +0000, Malcolm Hutty wrote: Can we agree the principle that we're only changing the voting threshold and not trying to create a new presumption of obedience
I do not actually see how the presumption worry is motivated, but I don't care enough about this to argue. If it will make us go faster, I'm in favour; if it adds even one millisecond additional time to completion, I'm opposed.
Best regards,
A
-- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_ listinfo_accountability-2Dcross-2Dcommunity&d=CwICAg&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lU Lrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=XeZKVf7ltEE1XS0lIZ8ik0 d8Fq4bb8uB8eHAhtIwcG8&s=rqp_PSPEtRngvqphpwUVXwobPKgFOnIQNDvF8dRJhPQ&e=
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community