Thank you [...] With regard to liability, members, officers and agents are not individually or personally liable for the association's debts or liabilities on the sole basis of their relationship with the association. [...] At present, the individuals bear personal liability for their actions. If the association were to be disregarded, they would still have the same personal liability for their actions. Thus, organizing the participants into an unincorporated association under California law would not make the participants worse off. [...] Never mind the double qualification in the first paragraph, this does not address liability (by UA members) for the UA's actions. Or am I missing something here? el On 2015-07-09 17:23, James Gannon wrote:
I believe it was in the revised memo on unincorporated associations here: https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/52890082/REVISED%20memo%20o...
-James [...]>
-- Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar) el@lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell) PO Box 8421 \ / Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/