Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Transparency recap (Was: Contribution on Transparency Reforms for CCWG)

You mean just like you agreed with the identified consensus on a Membership model. So, to follow the ALAC example, there's no reason why, even if was the case that it was a WS2 (which I doubt), it has to remain so. On 30/10/15 14:17, Alan Greenberg wrote:

Transparency is needed, but the CCWG identified this as a WS2 issue.