Generally speaking, IMHO, the co-chairs and all participating CCWG have done a magnificent job so far in the face of the complexities and difficulties. My comment should not be read as comment on any one meeting. I was not there. RD On Sep 28, 2015 9:12 AM, "Nigel Roberts" <nigel@channelisles.net> wrote:
I resent the below, as I perceive it as insultingly and smugly ironic.
Mr Daniel does not appear to have been at the same meeting I was at, which, whilst I would not seek to disparage either side in the battle lines which have, apparently now been drawn, can, I feel be described as nothing less than a failure.
If that is a magnificent job, I'd hate to see a workmanlike one.
On 28/09/15 01:38, Rudolph Daniel wrote:
And a chance to justify a multistakeholder pat on the back for doing a magnificent job so far in the global public interest. ;)
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community