Hi Adam, Great work, the general concept and most of the content is really good. If we add it to our report, I expect it will really help readers to grasp the essence of what we are proposing quickly. Some remarks: I take it that the graphics will be expanded to cover all the essential changes we propose (bylaws, reconsideration process) The slide ³Approve changes to fundamental bylaws² still needs editing. How it works it NOT that AC/SO object to the change. ICANN proposes a change and the ³empowered community² approves or not The slide ³Recalling individual board members also needs editing. The ³who can initiate a petition² is only proposed for recall of NomCom appointees. The way it is placed now, suggests it would also apply for SO and AC appointees Best, Roelof On 01-05-15 06:23, "Adam Peake" <adam.peake@icann.org> wrote:
Hi everyone,
XPLANE are working to improve the graphics you saw on the call and would appreciate any feedback.
Any corrections, comments or ideas on how best to display the board removal/recall?
The IRP has been mentioned as the "crown jewels" of the CCWG's work - are the graphics a good representation of what the group is proposing?
Thank you,
Adam