Hi, A lot has been said, there has been examples and counter examples as well. Could you share at least one example that has survived being countered and most importantly a mission wording that will adequately address that example. Thanks Sent from my Asus Zenfone2 Kindly excuse brevity and typos. On 22 Nov 2015 00:42, "Paul Rosenzweig" < paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com> wrote:
Yes but there have been many such examples already e.g. Melton 5 minutes ago. We are already in the drafting. So this seems a bit retrograde mo?
-- Paul Sent from myMail app for Android Saturday, 21 November 2015, 05:13PM -06:00 from Bruce Tonkin < Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au>:
Hello Paul,
I read the concerns about the restriction clause as suggesting that it be deleted (perhaps I am wrong in this)
No- we didn’t say that a restriction clause should be deleted.
We said:
" The Board asks that the CCWG provide some examples of what the CCWG believes that ICANN should and should not be able to do. That information can then be provided to counsel to see if text can be drafted to address the broader concerns."
Regards, Bruce Tonkin
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org <https://e-aj.my.com/compose?To=Accountability%2dCross%2dCommunity@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community