To be Frank, it's pretty rude to expect everyone to use the same software supplier. (In fact, in some circumstances it's even anti-competitive). Why can't we use open standards, again? On 09/03/2015 07:46 PM, Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez wrote:
I welcome your increasing flexibility the Apple store a a free app to read MS word documents now that should work in you iPad mini
Good luck
Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez _____________________
email: crg@isoc-cr.org <mailto:crg@isoc-cr.org> Skype: carlos.raulg +506 8837 7173 (cel) +506 4000 2000 (home) +506 2290 3678 (fax) _____________________ Apartado 1571-1000 San Jose, COSTA RICA
On Sep 3, 2015, at 11:56 AM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el@lisse.na <mailto:el@lisse.na>> wrote:
I am not even going to bother to ask, for, the umpteenth time, that documents are posted in an open format.
el
-- Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini
On Sep 3, 2015, at 17:24, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com <mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com>> wrote:
All:
For what it's worth, I prepared track changes comparisons of the following:
CCWG Proposal vs. AoC language Board Proposal vs. AoC language Board Proposal vs. CCWG Proposal
These are attached.
Greg
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Malcolm Hutty <malcolm@linx.net <mailto:malcolm@linx.net>> wrote:
On 03/09/2015 13:27, Bruce Tonkin wrote: > Hello Malcolm, > > On 02/09/2015 02:24, Bruce Tonkin wrote: >> ICANN commits to enforcing its policy relating to the current WHOIS >> and any future gTLD Directory Service, > > To be clear - we are not talking about any specific service here with any pre-conceived set of requirements.
Indeed. But I did think there was a risk that wording could be (mis)interpreted to suggest that we are - and then used to that effect when discussing what that future Directory Service might look like.
> We are talking about a new service that is established as a result of a policy development process in the GNSO. If it helps you could add the text: > > "any future gTLD DIrectory Service, established via ICANN's bottom up policy development process".
I think that would help.
The only point that I'm making is that we aren't trying to pre-empt that process or use this insertion into the Bylaws to direct certain outcomes from it. On that, I think we're all agreed; it's just a matter of being clear in the language we choose.
-- Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523 <tel:%2B44%2020%207645%203523> Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/
London Internet Exchange Ltd 21-27 St Thomas Street, London SE1 9RY
Company Registered in England No. 3137929 Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
<CCWG vs AoC Whois Review Comparison.docx> <Board vs AoC Whois Review Comparison.docx> <Board vs CCWG Whois Review Comparison.docx> _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community