As I see it, one of the important results of this debate is that we try to achieve consensus. It is also apparent that there is considerable interest in filing minority reports. But the deadline for doing so appears to be very tight, and I am not sure of the rationale for doing so. There is always a need for an appropriate amount of time to properly draft a dissenting report. In my view it would be unfortunate if those who wish to file minority reports were excluded by a timetable which prohibited proper consideration. I raise this as an issue of fairness, and wonder if it is possible to extend this out a little further. Regards Chris LaHatte Ombudsman Blog https://omblog.icann.org/ Webpage http://www.icann.org/en/help/ombudsman Confidentiality All matters brought before the Ombudsman shall be treated as confidential. The Ombudsman shall also take all reasonable steps necessary to preserve the privacy of, and to avoid harm to, those parties not involved in the complaint being investigated by the Ombudsman.The Ombudsman shall only make inquiries about, or advise staff or Board members of the existence and identity of, a complainant in order to further the resolution of the complaint. The Ombudsman shall take all reasonable steps necessary to ensure that if staff and Board members are made aware of the existence and identity of a complainant, they agree to maintain the confidential nature of such information, except as necessary to further the resolution of a complaint