George, We are not talking about connectivity, we are talking about substantial misconduct (and in a multi-stakeholder environment). However it is quite helpful to know that you set the bar very high. el On 2015-07-17 14:20 , George Sadowsky wrote:
Eberhard -
as long as nations practice sovereignty, things like this will happen. ICAN's remit does not extend to ensuring connectivity (access rights) or other such rights in other countries. If it did, we should ave been very active in North Korea for the last 15 years.
I am with James.
George
On Jul 17, 2015, at 2:11 PM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el@lisse.NA> wrote:
Oh, yes, it is.
Didn't Egypt turn off their DNS for a few days during the struggles?
I would consider this substantial misbehavior...
el
On 2015-07-17 14:04 , James M. Bladel wrote:
I am not in favor of introducing ³human rights² in to the ICANN bylaws, which IMO would dramatically increase its scope as a technical/commercial organization. ICANN is not in a position to either establish or reinforce anyone¹s ³rights².
Thanks‹
J. [...]