If left to the GAC, GPI becomes the intersection of National Public Interests, i.e. their consensus point. And if they are the only ones concerning themselves with GPI as opposed to it being one of the strategic priorities for ICANN as a whole then that is all we have to work on. avri On 26-Dec-15 13:20, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
Not really wanting to wade into ICANN 's (ab)use of whatever GPI is to further their interests, but I don't think it is the sum of National Interests.
el
-- Sent from Dr Lisse's iPhone 6s
On 26 Dec 2015, 19:27 +0200, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com>, wrote:
Avri, GPI is not limited to HR. Any description of GPI will be subject to challenge due to the fact that GPI is a cumulative of national/nation PI which varies From country to country snd culture to culture. Regards Kavousd
Sent from my iPhone
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus