On 09/10/2015 22:51, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
6. Mechanism for binding IRP where a panel decision is enforceable in any court recognizing international arbitration results — even if ICANN’s board refused to participate in the binding arbitration. (assuming CCWG lawyers verify this works without activating a Membership model)
SO: Will be good to know if this is now confirmed to be Yes or No.
Seun, I am also eagerly awaiting Counsel's response. Not only was it a significant assertion in Jones Day's memo of 1st October (second sub-bullet on page 2) and repeated in Jones Day's memo of Oct 7th ("Fourth,..."), confirmation has been certified as Question 68. See https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=52896826 So it won't be forgotten. I do hope this will be ready before we leave for Dublin, as it really is a crucial question. Holly or Rosemary: sorry to press, but any hints on when to expect Q68? Malcolml -- Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523 Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/ London Internet Exchange Ltd 21-27 St Thomas Street, London SE1 9RY Company Registered in England No. 3137929 Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA