On the contrary Nigel, the Board is against it, but if the community insists it will happen! :-) Yes, I know ... and someday the horse will sing ... but I insist on optimism. I will not eat crumbs P Paul Rosenzweig paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com O: +1 (202) 547-0660 M: +1 (202) 329-9650 VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739 Skype: paul.rosenzweig1066 Link to my PGP Key -----Original Message----- From: Nigel Roberts [mailto:nigel@channelisles.net] Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 3:31 PM To: accountability-cross-community@icann.org Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Communications Ideas Unified Community Membership Model Or UCMM. But we can call it it a meerkat for all I'm concerned, the Board are still against it and therefore it won't happen. I predicted this some months ago, on the basis of what happened to the IFWP. I can't say it gives me no pleasure to be proved right. I'm only human, and I feel a bit smug, to be honest. But I so wish I had been wrong. On 28/09/15 20:23, Avri Doria wrote:
On 28-Sep-15 15:06, Kieren McCarthy wrote:
* Last suggestion: stop calling it the "single member model". Call it something that makes immediate sense to everyone and has a positive feel to it. That way people can understand it. And you give the Board a way to save face.
good idea.
something like?
unified community member model
--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community