Obvious. As much as for the CEO of a Registry, since Registries have announced their intention to be the sole outside Accountabilty instance for the naming functions, but in the rush to select candidates even before the charter has been approved, nobody has raised the issue so far. Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez +506 8335 2487 Enviado desde mi iPhone
El nov 12, 2014, a las 4:31 PM, Carrie <carriedev@gmail.com> escribió:
Is it not a conflict of interest for Strickling to serve on any ICANN committee since Strickling works for DOC the entity to whom ICANN is contracted or is Strickling broadcasting plans to take a job w ICANN if it leaves US control?
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 12, 2014, at 4:58 PM, Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad@icann.org> wrote:
To view the original post, please see: https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-11-12-en
The Public Experts Group (PEG) continues its deliberations on Advisors for the Enhancing ICANNAccountability Cross Community Working Group (CCWG). The PEG expects to deliver the names of up to seven Advisors by the end of November.
The PEG acknowledges the distribution of the Enhancing ICANN Accountability CCWG proposed charter[DOCX, 67 KB] on 3 November 2014 and is conscious of the timeline for community adoption of the charter and the expected beginning of deliberations the CCWG in late November or early December.
The PEG last issued a statement on 14 October 2014, after meeting during the ICANN 51 meeting. The PEG members, Jeanette Hofmann, Janis Karklins, Larry Strickling and Brian Cute, discussed and agreed to the areas of expertise and evaluation criteria they would use in the selection process. The areas of expertise are as follows:
Board Governance and Corporate Management (for example operational, finance, risk management) Global Accountability and Transparency – theoretical, practical, tools and metrics Global Ethics Frameworks and Human Rights (for example consumer protection) Governmental Engagement and Relations and Multistakeholder Governance International Law/ Jurisprudence (for example choice of law) The PEG is also considering the need for diversity (for example, geographic, gender) in the Advisors when evaluating candidates.
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community