At the moment I would not die in an ditch over a membership model or not. As a proponent of democratic legitimacy I have a distinct preference for the legitimacy that a grassroots membership model provides, but I am open to persuausion by the proponents of either. However, my understanding is that a membership model may not be acceptable to the one stakeholder that really counts. So is that true? And if so, how do we proceed? On 07/07/15 11:12, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
Dear Co-Chairs,
while this may be true, or not, it most certainly describes that there was not consensus among the public comments.
el
On 2015-07-06 21:04, Jonathan Zuck wrote:
Hmm. I think it’s important to bear in mind that there was overwhelming consensus among the public comments to support the membership model. The detractors from the model, while important and perhaps critical, are not in the majority. I’m not sure this process speaks to how we better use counsel as much as how we achieve consensus on principles.
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community