I would be kind of interested in what key driving issues had changed after the Public Comment Period to have the ALAC appointed members have their mind changed for them. If any. el On 2015-11-12 17:03, Alan Greenberg wrote:
I always thought that it was a sign of intelligence to reconsider positions when the situation changes, and particularly when the key issues that drove the decision have substantially changed.
I am sure that the good doctor follows this process in his medical practice.
Alan
At 12/11/2015 08:42 AM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
Far be it for me to wade into this logorrhea, but for needing to point that the Sole Member Model was rejected AFTER the fact by the very same members appointed by ALAC to the CCWG who had supported it DURING the process.
el [...]