On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 10:14:41AM -0500, Greg Shatan wrote:
I agree with the result the Board came to (at least in part), but not the reasoning.
[…]
exercise its powers through the Designator. As a practical matter, this can be solved by having any of the SOs or ACs exercise the inspection right, so we're covered that way.)
Since the bylaws don't contain the reasoning for why a particular arrangement happens, but instead just contains the arrangement, what difference does it make the reasons people have to believe the conclusion we seem to be reaching? I like the emphasis on the practical matter: let's find a way to make the outcome right. It seems to me that making inspection a community power rather than one of the designator rather improves the value of inspection to the community, so we should embrace that conclusion (regardess of why people think it's the right one) and move on. Best regards, A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com