Greetings All from Frankfurt airport. My apologies for having to leave early. My congratulations to our 3 chairs and all the staff involved for helping us to have a very productive and thought provoking two days. I look forward to seeing the outputs and to continuing to work in a spirit of creativity and cooperation towards achieving our goals. Cheers, Chris Chris Disspain | Chief Executive Officer .au Domain Administration Ltd T: +61 3 8341 4111 | F: +61 3 8341 4112 E: ceo@auda.org.au | W: www.auda.org.au auDA - Australia's Domain Name Administrator
On 21 Jan 2015, at 02:01, Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au> wrote:
Hello Jordan,
* establish that a particular action was outside the Bylaws and refer it back to the ICANN Board for reconsideration
- my sense of the discussion on this was that the idea was that the group would have standing to launch some form of independent panel process to decide whether an action was outside of the bylaws. i.e. the group doesn't make the decision about bylaws, it makes a decision to send a matter to an independent panel.
* invalidate a decision of the ICANN Board
As per above - I think any decision to invalidate a decision should be on the basis that the Board hasn't followed its bylaws - not just that a group doesn't like a decision. An independent review panel may have as one of its powers the ability to recommend or bind the Board to reverse a decision, after it has found that the Board's original decision was not consistent with its bylaws or articles of association.
Regards, Bruce Tonkin
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community