Andrew Let us leave the issue forming As something is evolving which could addressed all these issues Kavouss Sent from my iPhone
On 3 Feb 2016, at 04:54, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 11:53:05PM +0100, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
Our mandate is limited to discuss the initial Becky’s proposal and mine only
I wasn't aware tht we were so procedure bound, and I do not recall those instructions from the chairs. Moreover, my quick review of the transcript from the last call also does not show such a rigid procedural approach. On the contrary, it seems that the goal is to be as flexible as possible with any procedure at all in the interests of forging a widely-acceptable consensus. Such a flexible attitude is what I have previously observed from our co-chairs, so it does not surprise me.
Therefore, I'm wondering on what grounds you think there was such a strict limit on what we could do.
Best regards,
A
-- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community